09/08/08

School transportation in Lawrence, yes or no?

Peter Larocque, Lawrence School Committee

In last month’s article I referred to the action taken by Lawrence City Officials that brought this issue of School Transportation to the front and center for major discussion in the FY09 Lawrence City Budget process.

This was the line item that was left out of the FY09 School Department‘s Budget presented to the Lawrence City Council in May of 2008 by the Mayor and the Budget and Finance Director. But in the original Lawrence School Department’s FY09 Budget adopted by the Lawrence School Committee in April 2008 it was included.

To fix this unfortunate situation, there had to be an additional appropriation given to the City Council for approval that returned the Transportation Line item funds to the FY09 School budget. It was approved along with the FY09 city budget. Now I would like to proceed in this article regarding future budgets and whether or not they should include school transportation.

When we talk about Lawrence School Transportation we must first make it clear of what exactly we are talking about. There are several types of transportation services that are provided by the Lawrence Public School Department with each service having it’s own set of rules and guidelines which some are protected by State and Federal Laws that are not part of this discussion.

For instance, we provide transportation for our Special Education Needs Students, which is a door-to-door service, which is mandated by law, therefore is not part of this discussion. We also provide transportation for our General Education Students who are eligible for this service according to district policy and state law. It is in this category of transportation that the City of Lawrence may make changes in its budget if it so desires. What state law protects is transportation for children in grades k to six and live outside of the two-mile range from the school they attend along with students classified as Homeless.

Our School District Policy has been to include transportation for High School Students and Parochial Students who fall under the provision of living outside the two-mile range for safety reasons. These services have been part of the Lawrence School Department Transportation for years. So to just eliminate these services by a stroke of the pen is in my opinion disrespectful to the parents or guardians of students who have come accustom to receiving these services. I do not believe that this was done maliciously, but it was done with a tremendous lack of forethought as to how this decision would impact the Citizens of Lawrence.

Having said that, I understand in these economic times that we as a city find ourselves in; all available ways that we can save money should be on the table for discussion. If in the future those who are responsible to provide ways of saving money for the city want to cut transportation service to students who are not in the k-to sixth grade and live outside the two mile range and who are not in the Homeless Category, can do so if they go about it in a civil manner and provide enough time for parents or guardians to make other arrangements for their children.

   For example, lets say by September, the beginning of the school year of 2011 –2012, the City of Lawrence will no longer provide transportation for High School Students and the others who are not covered by state law. Or another example would be in this same time period we would only provide transportation for the following months, which are: December, January, February, and March. The reason I suggest this is because of the condition of the roads and sidewalks in the winter months. For some reason property owners have a hard time shoveling their walkways and our children would be forced to walk the streets, which puts them in harms way. If this proposal were to become reality, then the penalty for snow-covered walkways should be a hefty fine and it must be enforced. Then may I also suggest that the city use this money to keep our crosswalks well painted and employ more crossing guards for our major intersections. These conditions are not optional, they are a must if you want to have our children walk to school.

So, here we have Plan A which states that beginning the school year 2011 –2012 the City of Lawrence will only be providing transportation for students who are in grades k-to six and live two miles or more from school and to students who are classified as homeless. Plan B states that only in the months of November, December, January and February will transportation be provided to those students not covered by plan A. Both of these plans allows for parents or guardians time to make adjustments to their schedule and make other arrangements for their children to get to school. This also provides time for the city of Lawrence to get their act together and make the changes necessary so that our streets and sidewalks are safe for our children to walk to school.

Something else that we should mention is the health benefit that our children would receive from walking to and from school on a daily basis. Childhood obesity is an epidemic according to the United States Acting Surgeon General Rear Admiral Steven K. Galson, M.D., M.P.H., in a speech he delivered during his visit to Lawrence on June 30,2008. Walking is a healthy exercise that could provide the help needed in fighting obesity for some of our students.

So in conclusion, if in the future the City of Lawrence decided to eliminate providing transportation to students who are not protected by law, it could do so only after providing the safety measures previously discussed. This would take an all out commitment from every citizen of Lawrence along with its city officials, elected or employed, including the Lawrence Police Department enforcing the Law of the roads. This effort must include all parents or guardians, voicing their opinion on this topic. So please let us all give this some thought before we rush and use our erasers in preparing our future budgets. This is a decision that involves the entire city and must be debated and discussed openly and honestly at future City Budget Forums conducted by the Mayor of the City and the Budget and Finance Director. This is not a decision to be left up to POLITICIANS. God Bless

peterlarocque@hotmail.com



>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

All pictures and material are
(C) copyright, Valley Patriot, Inc., 2008

*September 2008 Edition PDF


September 2008 Index

August Index Page

Valley Patriot_Archives

Email us here

2008 Ad Rates

About Us
(978) 557-5413 office
(978) 258-1964 fax

2008 Ad Rates
(line ads .80 cents per word)
Pay by credit card using PayPal below

Now Accepting PAYPAL!
The Valley Patriot is now
accepting credit cards for
subscription and advertising

Valley Patriot Distribution MAP*


VALLEY PATRIOT OF THE MONTH...

Joe Bella of Methuen

... sponsored by

Prior Valley Patriots
of the Month

To Our Brave
Heroes THANK YOU!

About Us
(978) 557-5413 office
(978) 258-1964 fax

2008 Ad Rates
(line ads .80 cents per word)
Pay by credit card using PayPal below

Valley Patriot Distribution MAP*

Valley Patriot ARCHIVES

Page Two

>>>

Archives

>>>

Valley Patriot Ad Info

>>>

Contact us