THINKING OUTSIDE
THE BOX
Are you a conservative?
Can you pass the
conservatice litmus test? part II
Dr. Charles Ormsby
Are you a conservative?
Can you pass the conservative litmus
test? Part II Last month we
established a political foundation for
Conservatives in the form of four core
principles (the basic Conservative litmus
test):
* A dedication to individual liberty and
the primacy of the individual,
* A government dedicated to the rule of
law (starting but not ending with strict
interpretation of our Constitution based
on the original intent of the Founders),
* A no-compromise stance in defense of
our most fundamental rights with
particular focus on our First and Second
Amendment rights, and
* An insistence that government
violations of our property rights be
substantially reduced through a radical
reform of our tax laws.
Any significant deviation from these
principles by a candidate for public
office seeking the support of
Conservatives should be considered
disqualifying.
But what about the myriad of day-to-day
issues such as Social Security, health
care, welfare, education, abortion, labor
laws, and energy policy
right down
to more mundane issues such as smoking
and helmet laws?
Each of these issues represents a problem
that must be addressed and each has its
own complicating factors. In some cases
the dominant factor is technology, in
others it is cost, and in still others it
is a question of organization, meaning,
how should human and other capital assets
be deployed to provide an appropriate
solution? Of course, for the two lesser
issues listed it is none of these; it is
merely that some people just do not like
being told what to do! Which leads to a
critical question: Who should decide; the
government or the individual?
Before government social engineers start
concocting solutions to these
societal problems, maybe we
should take a deep breath and think about
the core principles and how they should
guide Conservatives as we consider policy
options.
Our core principles demand that the
policies Conservatives champion must
maximize individual liberty so that we,
as individuals or with the mutual
cooperation of others, can produce the
necessities of life and, with hard work,
accumulate assets that will make life as
comfortable and enjoyable as possible.
It is not governments function to
produce or provide those necessities; nor
is it to guarantee any particular
standard of living or protect us from our
own ignorance or stupidity. If it were,
it would logically follow that government
must have the power to abrogate our
rights. Otherwise, how could it fulfill
its responsibilities? Government would
need to have the power to command
individuals to produce and then
confiscate the products of those efforts.
Individual rights are meaningless in this
context.
Liberty demands that governments
role be limited to protecting us from
others (foreign and domestic) who would
initiate force or fraud against us and
threaten our lives or property.
Regular readers of this column are
probably prepared for an argument in
favor of a return to the libertarian
ideal; one that was most closely
approximated during Jeffersons
tenure as president 200 years ago. While
that is tempting and represents a
prescription I would endorse, the
political state of affairs that existed
during Jeffersons time has receded
so far in our rearview mirror that it
might take generations to recapture.
Unfortunately, we now have a population
that has lost its appreciation for the
gift of liberty and we are saddled with a
legal and regulatory infrastructure that
is choking the life out of society. The
most valuable contribution Conservatives
can make is to chart a course on every
issue that will move us in the direction
of greater individual liberty and
personal responsibility. What are the
characteristics that Conservative
policies should exhibit?
If our policies are to be consistent with
our core principles, they must emphasize
persuasion, not force. Our laws must
allow individuals to interact with each
other based on voluntary and mutual
consent to the maximum extent possible
and not force us to participate through
compulsion. In the economic sphere, this
means free market solutions should be
emphasized whenever possible.
This is the polar opposite of modern
Liberal dogma that emphasizes a
collective determination of what is best
for everyone (as determined by the
anointed Liberal elite) and then enacting
laws to impose that solution by force.
For Liberals, liberty is an after-thought
or, more likely, a major impediment to
their agenda.
Different Conservatives, addressing these
issues and sincerely trying to follow the
principles suggested here, may come up
with different proposed solutions. This
is merely a sign that the problems are
challenging, not that there is
necessarily any ill-intent. Analysis and
debate should follow and, hopefully, one
or several specific solutions will emerge
that are worthy of widespread
Conservative support.
The above table
provides a comparison, at a very general
level, of the differences in approach to
major policy issues. The Conservative
positions outlined are not meant to be
ideologically pure, but they will set us
on a course that increases individual
freedom. On a purely practical level,
they will also ensure a rapidly improving
standard of living that is in stark
contrast to the economic failure that our
Liberal/Socialist course has in store for
us.
The comparison couldnt be starker.
The ideological battle for the last 225
years - maybe 10,000 years - has been
between individual liberty and government
coercion. Once coercion gains its final
grip, it will take centuries to be
loosened. We have become accustomed to a
significant degree of personal liberty
and we treat it as a cheap birthright.
But infringements of that liberty are now
commonplace and most of us take it as a
legitimate role of government to impose
those infringements for the common
good.
We are near a tipping point. Our society
is on the verge of falling over an abyss.
The fall will be difficult to survive and
the abyss nearly impossible to climb out
of.
Most of the rest of the world is
wandering about at the bottom of this
abyss and looking up clueless as
to how we reached the top and hating us
for our good fortune. Many in the U.S.
are equally clueless of how we got to the
top. One thing is certain: it wasnt
merely good fortune that got us here. Our
forefathers treasured individual liberty
and understood how important the concepts
of liberty, free markets and limited
government were.
We are about to squander these gifts due
to ignorance and neglect. This would be
the most sinful act in history. Only if
Conservatives grasp these core principles
and band together to defeat the champions
of collectivism will our free society
survive.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
All pictures and
material are
(C) copyright, Valley Patriot, Inc., 2008
|