>>Valley Patriot>>


HAVERHILL'S FUTURE
Leadership Needed in Parking Crisis
Jim Rurak, Former Haverhill Mayor
(03/06/07)

The mayor canceled last Thursday’s public meeting on where to put the downtown parking garage.

His aide said that they needed more time to respond to a growing set of concerns that a five-story structure on the Ted’s for Tires lot would be downright ugly.

They can take all the time they want, but unless they make it invisible, the massive garage will be ugly as sin. It will spoil the ambience of the district it is supposed to serve. It will be taller than any of the beautiful buildings around it. Its ugliness will be matched only by the vast shadow it will cast over the streets and square beside it.

The mayor’s in a real bind. His repeated failures to win approval of a parking plan means that he must now race to get that plan approved and begin to build a garage.

Otherwise, the grant monies for the garage could be lost. He also needs to do something before the election. But now that his favorite site is controversial, he seems to face the choice between building an ugly garage or losing a lot of votes.

So what do we do?

As I understand it, the federal and state grants require that we construct parking facilities that serve more than just automobiles. The Ted’s site works because it’s close to the railroad station and we plan to move the bus station there. Bingo, it’s cars, buses and trains, or “multimodal” as planners call it. But a five-story structure is just so ugly. Some, therefore, want to put the massive structure on the other side of the tracks, on the way to Lafayette Square. That works theoretically, but it’s too far away from the businesses and residences it’s supposed to serve.

To get beyond this impasse, we need to think outside the big-box approach to parking in which both sides of the above impasse seem to be stuck. We need at least to talk about an approach Lou Fossarelli proposed a short while ago.

Lou wanted to buy air-rights over the Wingate Street lot, build a one-story garage, sell the lots upstairs to condo owners, improve the downstairs (the existing Wingate lot), and then give it back to the city. It’s a classic public-private partnership that might work. But that’s not my point just yet. I want to talk about the one-story design.

Go to the Ted’s site. Imagine a one-story platform at the same level as the railroad station and tracks. Imagine it covering the existing lot and the other private lots that form the whole site where they want to put the massive garage. The bus station could be down below as well as perhaps 60 spaces. Eighty more spaces could be added on the upper level. You gain a lot fewer spaces, but you actually beautify the area.

Now, to get all the extra spaces that downtown needs you repeat the magic. Stand on the corner at Mark’s Deli. The road down to the parking lot behind the Lasting Room and Tap is steep. If we put the Riverwalk down below, it will not be handicap accessible by foot. Furthermore, driving up that ramp onto Washington Street is dangerous to cars and people. Imagine a level platform that goes out from the top of the ramp over the existing lot. The ramp down to the lower lot could be down by the river, so could a wheelchair ramp that made the Riverwalk accessible. This is multimodal too! Cars, bikes, wheelchairs and pedestrians all can use it. It makes the Riverwalk accessible. It improves public safety.

Now, imagine other sites throughout the downtown, perhaps behind Casey paper, perhaps at Locust and Essex, perhaps behind Haverhill Beef.

We could get all the extra spaces we know we need and we could distribute them to places where we most need them. One-story decks go up fast, they blend into, rather than destroy, the atmosphere around them. They are easier to maintain. Every place we put one between Washington/Merrimack Streets and the seawall could be an entry to our envisioned Riverwalk, so they are multi-transportation oriented. If there is a site that doesn’t by itself meet that test, we could argue that it is part of an overall plan that makes more types of transit accessible to more people over the whole of the city.

Multiple sites for one-story decks make for a simple idea. Let’s at least start talking about it, before we’re all staring at a massive structure nobody likes.

Jim Rurak is a professor at Boston College and is the former mayor of Haverhill. Email your comments or questions to Jim Rurak at JARandKAS@comcast.net.


 *Send your questions comments to ValleyPatriot@aol.com
The March 2007 Edition of the Valley Patriot
The Valley Patriot is a Monthly Publication.
All Contents (C) 2007
, Valley Patriot, Inc.
We publish 12,000 newspapers and distribute in Andover, North Andover,
Methuen, Haverhill, Chelmsford, Georgetown, Groveland, Boxford, Amesbury,
Lawrence, Dracut, Tewksbury, MERRIMACK, Hampton & Salisbury Beach, and Lowell.

Valley Patriot Archive

Valley Patriot Story
ARCHIVES

Prior Lead Stories

Prior Valley Patriot Editorials

Prior Columns by ...

Tom Duggan
Dr. Chuck Ormsby
Paula Porten
Ralph Wilbur
Hanna
Ted Tripp

Valley Patriot of the Month

Griselsilva.com

Patrick Blanchette
D.J. Beauregard
Jim Cassidy
D.J. Deeb
Marcos Devers
Bob Desmarais
Regina Faticanti
Jim Fiorentini
Bill Kelly
Wilfredo Laboy
Peter Larocque
Vilma Lora
Ed Maguire
Billy Manzi
Paul Murano
Mark Palermo
Hartley Pleshaw
Debbie Quinn
Raise Em Right
Dr. Peary
Kathleen Corey Rahme
Barney Reilly
Angel Rivera
Jim Rurak
Grisel Silva
Mike Sullivan
Sandra Stotsky
Mike Sweeney
Ken Willette
Scott Wood
Jim Xenakis